Organising the switch to low-sulphur fuel | John LaRese, ExxonMobil Updated on 24 Aug 2018 04:23 GMT By John LaRese, Marine Fuels Technical Advisor, ExxonMobil The International Maritime Organization's (IMO) decision to implement a 0.50 percent cap on sulphur emissions has created uncertainty amongst vessel operators. Questions are already being asked about how to comply with the changing emissions target, what types of fuels will be available and where. However, ensuring compliance isn't just about fuel selection; the actual switchover process from heavy fuel oil (HFO) to new, low-sulphur alternatives needs careful management. There are also implications for the selection of lubricants. A series of important steps need to be taken before bunkering a low-sulphur fuel; vessel operators will therefore have to work out arrangements that meet the specific requirements of their vessels. Significantly, without careful preparation operators may jeopardise their sulphur compliance, which carries the risk of costly fines. They must also plan around fuel availability, given the possibility that some ports may be unable to meet the demand from the industry. Tank cleaning Unless a vessel is fitted with a scrubber, operators will need to ensure that their fuel tanks do not contain high-sulphur HFO by the IMO deadline. Fuel tanks will probably retain sediment from the existing HFO, which is likely to contain those higher levels of sulphur. If this is not removed, there is the risk that the sulphur will contaminate the compliant fuel, pushing its sulphur content above the 0.50 percent limit. ExxonMobil expects that many compliant fuels entering the market will have a sulphur content very close to the 0.50 percent cap, so even very low levels of residual sulphur left in a fuel tank could tip a vessel over the IMO's compliance limit. To minimise this risk, ExxonMobil recommends that vessel operators flush fuel tanks with a distillate-based product, which will help remove sludge deposits. This process may need to be repeated, depending on the amount of residue present. In some instances, tank bottoms may have to be manually cleaned. The fuel used to flush tanks could contain damaging levels of cat fines, which will require on-board treatment. Vessel operators must factor in how long these processes could take and keep in mind that any sludge removed from the tanks will need to be disposed of properly. Operators should remember that the storage, handling and treatment of 0.50-percent-sulphur fuels will involve bunkering fuels of a wider variety of viscosities, types and formulations than seen today. On-board handling practices have to take into account likely changes in fuel types, including fuel segregation and routine compatibility testing. Running down cylinder oil stocks One benefit of the 0.50 percent sulphur cap is that vessels will be able to streamline their lubricant inventory as only one cylinder oil will be required. Vessels with scrubbers will continue to use HFO and high-BN oils, while those who choose to switch to low-sulphur fuels will need correspondingly low-BN formulations. These vessels must deplete their stocks of high-BN cylinder oils prior to the IMO deadline to avoid waste and disposal costs. To ensure compliance, ExxonMobil recommends that vessel operators work with suppliers who have adopted the latest ISO 8217:2017 fuel standard and have the proven technical expertise to help them navigate the upcoming changes.


Diğer Haberler:
  • International Convention on Arrest of Ships applies in Turkey
  • 58% of flag states could be removed from STCW White List
  • Agreement reached for European Maritime Single Window
  • Two Greek Shipping Companies Sentenced After Illegally Discharging Oil Into Texas Port Waters
  • MEPC 74
  • Suez Canal amends rules to increase LNG carrier transits
  • SOLAS Değişiklikleri
  • İş sağlığı ve güvenliği
  • Hong Kong: New and amended legislation under SOLAS
  • EU adopts proposal to revise system for shipping emissions monitoring
  • List of ships detained in UK in March 2019
  • IMO Sub-Committee to validate new model courses on IGF Code and ship safety
  • New regulatory BDN requirement from 1 January 2019
  • Panama Canal Consolidates its Strategic Position in the Transportation of Liquefied Natural Gas
  • IMO maritime data solution available after launch in Antigua and Barbuda
  • Crew members compensated for reporting owner’s illegal oil discharge
  • World’s first commercial drone deliveries to vessels at anchorage tested
  • Precautionary approach over marine geoengineering solutions for climate change
  • What is on the agenda for MSC 99?
  • SERA GAZI EMİSYONLARININ TAKİBİ
  • Shipping Firm Fined USD 1 Mn for Pollution Crimes
  • BlackseaMou kapsamında tutulan gemiler
  • MEPC 73
  • EU approves Denmark’s tonnage tax scheme extension
  • Marshall Adaları Denizcilik İdaresinden
  • Italy takes lead on SOLAS fire fighter radio specification
  • İçten yanmalı motorlardan çıkan emisyonlar
  • İngiltere sahil güvenlikte tutulan gemiler
  • Starry night - Depremler ve Gökyüzü
  • Annual report for 2017
  • BWM
  • Oily Mixtures (“Oily Bilge Water”) Management for Oceangoing Vessels of less than 400 Gross Tons
  • World Maritime Day theme 2019: "Empowering Women in the Maritime Community"
  • Panama Canal decreases maximum draft for new locks
  • New UAE updates on spill dispersants and ships carrying oil products
  • MEPC 72
  • Çevre Haberleri
  • Compensation regime for Hazardous and Noxious Cargoes a step closer
  • 835 Ships Scrapped in 2017
  • Kıyı tesisleri deniz kirliliği zorunlu mali sorumluluk sigortası
  • Etkinlikler
  • AB emisyon izinleri en yüksek düzeyde
  • California Ballast Water Management
  • Large Yacht Code: Retrospective requirements for existing yachts
  • IMO PPR 6 agrees on draft Guidelines for 2020 sulphur cap
  • Telsiz operatör yeterlilikleri ve sınav yönetmeliğinde değişiklikler
  • Balast suyu işletmesi -haberler
  • Chinese Pollution Regulations – Fines for failure to contract with SPRO
  • Requirements for MARPOL surveys in RMI-flagged yachts
  • Mediterranean SOx emission control area study begins
  • IBIA Wants Clarifications For High Sulphur Bunker Carriage Ban
  • Guidance on LNG Bunkering to Port Authorities and Administrations
  • MPA Singapore extends mandatory use of MFM system
  • İstanbul Boğazında Deniz Kirliliği görüntüleri
  • MARPOL değişiklikleri
  • Emergency escape breathing devices (EEBDs) onboard the Panama flag vessels
  • SOLAS 2014
  • CSS Code Annex 14
  • EU approves amended rules for ship inspection organisations
  • Baltık kuru yük endeksi ve Petrol Fiatları,piyasa haberleri
  • ClassNK releases Guidelines for Use of Drones in Class Surveys
  • Turkey ratifies ship recycling convention
  • -Comittee on Pollution Prevention and Response(PPR)
  • MSC 100th session
  • Montreux Sözleşmesi
  • Tubitak proje teklifleri
  • Addressing marine plastic litter from ships – action plan adopted
  • Port Reception facilities
  • Tüm Haberler
  • Konuyla İlgili Kitaplar
    © Prof. Dr. Mükerrem Fatma İlkışık
    Her Hakkı Saklıdır.

    Bu Site Bilgi Amaçlıdır Olup, İçeriğin Doğruluğu Hakkında Garanti Vermez.
    Bu Konularda Her Zaman IMO'nun Son Baskıları ve Genelgeleri Takip Etmeniz ve Klas Kuruluşunuza Başvurmanız Önerilir.
    SafranNET HazırSite ile hazırlanmıştır
    SafranNET ©