International Convention on Arrest of Ships applies in Turkey The International Convention on Arrest of Ships, 1999 (1999 Convention) was ratified by the Turkish Parliament on March 2017. Now, on May 3, 2019, the 1999 Convention officially became binding by law upon the Turkish authorities. The 1999 Convention brings little change to the rules that are already in place in Turkey, as the country has replicated the wording of the 1999 Convention into the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC) to a great extent which rendered the 1999 Convention applicable in Turkey in a de facto manner. However, article 3(1)(b) of the 1999 Convention allows the arrest of an offending ship if 'the demise charterer of the ship, at the time when the maritime claim arose, is liable for the claim and is the owner or the demise charterer of the ship when the arrest is effected.' The wording 'or the demise charterer' were not included into the TCC. The position with the arrest of sister ships on the other hand is identical in both regimes. The basis for not including claims against the demise charterer was the fact that the Turkish law concept of 'precautionary attachment' is possible only when the assets sought to be attached/arrested are owned by the person liable for the claim. As a result, when a demise charterer is liable for a claim, it was not possible in Turkey to arrest the offending ship because the claim is not against the registered owner of the ship. Nonetheless, the 1999 Convention applied with the original text. Thus, the official Turkish translation clarifies that an offending ship may be subject to arrest if the demise charterer of that ship who is liable for the claim remains the demise charterer at the time the arrest is effected. According to the British Chamber of Commerce in Turkey, this recent development paves the way for arrest of ships under demise charter for debts of the charterer given that international conventions take priority over national law. 21 05 2019

Diğer Haberler:
  • Sulphur 2020 implementation – IMO issues additional guidance
  • UN agency pushes forward on shipping emissions reduction
  • 58% of flag states could be removed from STCW White List
  • Two Greek Shipping Companies Sentenced After Illegally Discharging Oil Into Texas Port Waters
  • MEPC 74
  • Hong Kong: New and amended legislation under SOLAS
  • New regulatory BDN requirement from 1 January 2019
  • SOLAS Değişiklikleri
  • İş sağlığı ve güvenliği
  • EU adopts proposal to revise system for shipping emissions monitoring
  • List of ships detained in UK in March 2019
  • IMO Sub-Committee to validate new model courses on IGF Code and ship safety
  • Panama Canal Consolidates its Strategic Position in the Transportation of Liquefied Natural Gas
  • IMO maritime data solution available after launch in Antigua and Barbuda
  • Crew members compensated for reporting owner’s illegal oil discharge
  • World’s first commercial drone deliveries to vessels at anchorage tested
  • Precautionary approach over marine geoengineering solutions for climate change
  • MEPC 73
  • 835 Ships Scrapped in 2017
  • Etkinlikler
  • EU approves Denmark’s tonnage tax scheme extension
  • Organising the switch to low-sulphur fuel | John LaRese, ExxonMobil
  • World Maritime Day theme 2019: "Empowering Women in the Maritime Community"
  • Oily Mixtures (“Oily Bilge Water”) Management for Oceangoing Vessels of less than 400 Gross Tons
  • BWM
  • İngiltere sahil güvenlikte tutulan gemiler
  • AB emisyon izinleri en yüksek düzeyde
  • Çevre Haberleri
  • BlackseaMou kapsamında tutulan gemiler
  • İçten yanmalı motorlardan çıkan emisyonlar
  • Italy takes lead on SOLAS fire fighter radio specification
  • Annual report for 2017
  • Marshall Adaları Denizcilik İdaresinden
  • Kıyı tesisleri deniz kirliliği zorunlu mali sorumluluk sigortası
  • New UAE updates on spill dispersants and ships carrying oil products
  • MEPC 72
  • Starry night - Depremler ve Gökyüzü
  • Compensation regime for Hazardous and Noxious Cargoes a step closer
  • What is on the agenda for MSC 99?
  • Panama Canal decreases maximum draft for new locks
  • Shipping Firm Fined USD 1 Mn for Pollution Crimes
  • California Ballast Water Management
  • IMO PPR 6 agrees on draft Guidelines for 2020 sulphur cap
  • Large Yacht Code: Retrospective requirements for existing yachts
  • Guidance on LNG Bunkering to Port Authorities and Administrations
  • İstanbul Boğazında Deniz Kirliliği görüntüleri
  • SOLAS 2014
  • IBIA Wants Clarifications For High Sulphur Bunker Carriage Ban
  • Balast suyu işletmesi -haberler
  • Chinese Pollution Regulations – Fines for failure to contract with SPRO
  • CSS Code Annex 14
  • MPA Singapore extends mandatory use of MFM system
  • MARPOL değişiklikleri
  • Telsiz operatör yeterlilikleri ve sınav yönetmeliğinde değişiklikler
  • Emergency escape breathing devices (EEBDs) onboard the Panama flag vessels
  • Mediterranean SOx emission control area study begins
  • EU approves amended rules for ship inspection organisations
  • Turkey ratifies ship recycling convention
  • ClassNK releases Guidelines for Use of Drones in Class Surveys
  • -Comittee on Pollution Prevention and Response(PPR)
  • MSC 100th session
  • Tubitak proje teklifleri
  • Tüm Haberler
  • Konuyla İlgili Kitaplar
    © Prof. Dr. Mükerrem Fatma İlkışık
    Her Hakkı Saklıdır.

    Bu Site Bilgi Amaçlıdır Olup, İçeriğin Doğruluğu Hakkında Garanti Vermez.
    Bu Konularda Her Zaman IMO'nun Son Baskıları ve Genelgeleri Takip Etmeniz ve Klas Kuruluşunuza Başvurmanız Önerilir.
    SafranNET HazırSite ile hazırlanmıştır
    SafranNET ©