IBIA Wants Clarifications For High Sulphur Bunker Carriage Ban
THE PROPOSED CHANGE TO MARPOL ANNEX VI TO BAN THE CARRIAGE OF BUNKERS ABOVE 0.50% SULPHUR DOES NOT PREVENT THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO LOWER THESE EMISSIONS, SUCH AS SCRUBBERS. NOR DOES IT APPLY TO BUNKERS CARRIED AS CARGO.
 23/02/18
However, there are concerns that the regulatory change does not make this clear enough. Moreover, there are questions about how potential non-availability situations will be dealt with once it becomes an offence not just to use, but to carry non-compliant bunkers on vessels without valid exemptions.
There were long discussions at PPR 5 about, whether the amendment has to make it more explicit that high sulphur fuel bunkers can still be carried as cargo, and be carried by ships which have approved technology or exemptions to trial such technology, and whether it will be necessary also to make an explicit reference to the non-availability clause in Regulation 18.2 of MARPOL Annex VI.
Regulation 14 of MARPOL Annex VI does not allow the use of fuels with higher sulphur content than the applicable limit. The text will be changed to prohibit both use and carriage of non-compliant fuel.
However, Regulation 4 of MARPOL Annex VI allows ships to use higher sulphur fuel with abatement technology such as scrubbers, while Regulation 3 allows ships to be specifically exempted while trying abatement technology.
The proposal from Norway and the Cook Islands to PPR 5 argued that there was no need to make specific reference to equivalent arrangements approved in accordance with Regulation 4.1 or exemptions issued under Regulation 3.2 in the amended text as they are currently not referred to in Regulation 14, even if they might be applicable.
There was not full agreement on this, as many felt this new carriage prohibition is materially different from the existing prohibition to use bunkers above 0.50% sulphur after 1 January 2020, and that it would be wise to make explicit references under the amended Regulation 14 to Regulation 3, 4 and also to Regulation 18 regarding non-availability situations.
 
As a result, concerns were raised, saying that it was clear that the carriage ban only applies to high sulphur bunkers carried for combustion purposes, and not to cargo. PPR 5 agreed on the following amended text for Regulation 14, which is expected to take effect from 1 March 2020:
“The sulphur content of any fuel oil used or carried for use on board ships shall not exceed 0.50% m/m.”
Despite this, IBIA will ask for a small modification to this text to make sure it doesn’t unintentionally prevent bunker barges from carrying fuel oil exceeding 0.50% sulphur for delivery to ships with scrubbers.



Diğer Haberler:
  • International Convention on Arrest of Ships applies in Turkey
  • Agreement reached for European Maritime Single Window
  • New regulatory BDN requirement from 1 January 2019
  • MARPOL DEĞİŞİKLİKLERİ 2019
  • MARPOL DEĞİŞİKLİKLERİ 2019
  • Balast suyu işletmesi -haberler
  • Sulphur 2020 implementation – IMO issues additional guidance
  • UN agency pushes forward on shipping emissions reduction
  • 58% of flag states could be removed from STCW White List
  • Two Greek Shipping Companies Sentenced After Illegally Discharging Oil Into Texas Port Waters
  • MEPC 74
  • İş sağlığı ve güvenliği
  • SOLAS Değişiklikleri
  • IMO maritime data solution available after launch in Antigua and Barbuda
  • World’s first commercial drone deliveries to vessels at anchorage tested
  • EU approves Denmark’s tonnage tax scheme extension
  • Çevre Haberleri
  • BlackseaMou kapsamında tutulan gemiler
  • Etkinlikler
  • AB emisyon izinleri en yüksek düzeyde
  • İçten yanmalı motorlardan çıkan emisyonlar
  • İngiltere sahil güvenlikte tutulan gemiler
  • Italy takes lead on SOLAS fire fighter radio specification
  • Starry night - Depremler ve Gökyüzü
  • BWM
  • World Maritime Day theme 2019: "Empowering Women in the Maritime Community"
  • Organising the switch to low-sulphur fuel | John LaRese, ExxonMobil
  • SERA GAZI EMİSYONLARININ TAKİBİ
  • MEPC 73
  • 835 Ships Scrapped in 2017
  • Shipping Firm Fined USD 1 Mn for Pollution Crimes
  • Kıyı tesisleri deniz kirliliği zorunlu mali sorumluluk sigortası
  • MEPC 72
  • New UAE updates on spill dispersants and ships carrying oil products
  • California Ballast Water Management
  • IMO PPR 6 agrees on draft Guidelines for 2020 sulphur cap
  • Large Yacht Code: Retrospective requirements for existing yachts
  • MPA Singapore extends mandatory use of MFM system
  • MARPOL değişiklikleri
  • Guidance on LNG Bunkering to Port Authorities and Administrations
  • SOLAS 2014
  • Mediterranean SOx emission control area study begins
  • İstanbul Boğazında Deniz Kirliliği görüntüleri
  • CSS Code Annex 14
  • Telsiz operatör yeterlilikleri ve sınav yönetmeliğinde değişiklikler
  • Emergency escape breathing devices (EEBDs) onboard the Panama flag vessels
  • Chinese Pollution Regulations – Fines for failure to contract with SPRO
  • ClassNK releases Guidelines for Use of Drones in Class Surveys
  • -Comittee on Pollution Prevention and Response(PPR)
  • Tubitak proje teklifleri
  • Tüm Haberler
  • Konuyla İlgili Kitaplar
    © Prof. Dr. Mükerrem Fatma İlkışık
    Her Hakkı Saklıdır.

    Bu Site Bilgi Amaçlıdır Olup, İçeriğin Doğruluğu Hakkında Garanti Vermez.
    Bu Konularda Her Zaman IMO'nun Son Baskıları ve Genelgeleri Takip Etmeniz ve Klas Kuruluşunuza Başvurmanız Önerilir.
    SafranNET HazırSite ile hazırlanmıştır
    SafranNET ©